The summaries are free for public
use. The Chronic Liver Disease
Foundation will continue to add and
archive summaries of articles deemed
relevant to CLDF by the Board of
Trustees and its Advisors.
Abstract Details
Is UDCA really a post-transplant panacea?
Liver Transpl. 2021 Jan 19. doi: 10.1002/lt.25989. Online ahead of print.
Cynthia Levy1, Shahnaz Sultan2
Author information
1Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1500 NW 12th Avenue, suite 1101, Miami, FL, 33136.
2Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Core Investigator, Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis VA Health Care System.
Abstract
Recurrent primary biliary cholangitis (rPBC) occurs in up to 53% of LT recipients transplanted for PBC and negatively impacts long term graft (Hazard ratio 2.01) and patient survival (hazard ratio 1.72)(1). In multiple cohort studies, use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) post transplantation has been associated with a reduced incidence of rPBC. Biliary complications are reported in 10-35% of all liver transplant (LT) recipients and are clearly associated with increased morbidity and mortality(2). The term "biliary complications" encompasses a wide range of problems, including sludge, stones, casts, bile leaks, bilomas, anastomotic and non-anastomotic strictures and hemobilia. Conflicting data exist with respect to the benefit of UDCA post-LT to prevent biliary complications in general.