The summaries are free for public
use. The Chronic Liver Disease
Foundation will continue to add and
archive summaries of articles deemed
relevant to CLDF by the Board of
Trustees and its Advisors.
Abstract Details
Patients with AMA/anti-sp100/anti-gp210 Positivity and Cholestasis Can Manifest Conditions Beyond Primary Biliary Cholangitis.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The diagnostic value of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC)-specific antibodies in patients with elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels, and other identifiable causes, was unclear. Our study aimed to determine whether etiological treatments in PBC-specific antibody-positive patients could improve liver biochemical tests, thereby distinguishing them from individuals with PBC.
METHODS: We enrolled patients who were positive for PBC-specific antibodies and elevated ALP and/or GGT levels but with other identifiable etiologies. Changes in liver biochemistry following non-ursodeoxycholic acid etiological treatments were monitored.
RESULTS: A total of 155 patients with positive PBC-specific antibodies and elevated ALP and/or GGT levels due to non-PBC diseases were enrolled. Among them, 100 patients were diagnosed with non-PBC liver diseases, mainly metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, drug-induced liver injury, and autoimmune hepatitis. Additionally, 55 patients had non-liver diseases, predominantly connective tissue diseases. The median follow-up duration was 15.9 (4.7-25.6) months. Among 141 patients who completed follow-up after receiving etiological treatments, 85.1% (120/141) showed improvement in ALP and/or GGT levels, with 51.8% (73/141) achieving normalization of both ALP and GGT. However, 68 patients continued to exhibit elevated ALP and/or GGT, with 55 patients displaying isolated GGT elevation and 11 patients showing liver histological changes not consistent with PBC.
CONCLUSIONS: PBC-specific antibodies, along with elevated ALP and GGT levels, may occur in various non-PBC diseases. Etiological treatments may improve or even resolve cholestatic biochemistry. For these patients, initiating etiological treatment rather than immediately starting ursodeoxycholic acid therapy would be justified.