Reuters Health Information: Several oral direct-acting agent regimens effective for HCV infection
Several oral direct-acting agent regimens effective for HCV infection
Last Updated: 2017-03-21
By Will Boggs MD
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Highly effective, well-tolerated
oral direct-acting agent (DAA) regimens are now available for
all hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and for patient
populations historically considered difficult to cure, according
to a systematic review of 42 studies.
"We have multiple, highly effective, safe options for
hepatitis C treatment and cure,� Dr. Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia
from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore,
Maryland told Reuters Health by email. �As a medical community,
we need to expand our hepatitis C testing efforts so that
everyone who is infected is aware of their infection. Hepatitis
C infected individuals need to be linked to hepatitis C
treatment and treatment access expanded.�
Dr. Falade-Nwulia and colleagues systematically reviewed the
efficacy and safety of oral interferon-free HCV treatment
regimens that include at least 2 DAAs.
Six distinct DAA regimens provided sustained virological
response (SVR) rates greater than 95% for genotype 1 infection
for most drug combinations and patient populations, according to
the March 21st Annals of Internal Medicine online report.
Two DAA regimens, including sofosbuvir plus the NS5A
inhibitors velpatasvir or daclatasvir for 12 weeks, are
effective for treatment of HCV genotype 3 infection without
cirrhosis, and the combination sofosbuvir-velpatasvir offers
higher SVR rates in patients with cirrhosis.
For patients with genotype 3 infection, SVR rates were lower
in those with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis, prior
treatment experience, or NS5A resistance-associated
substitutions, whereas SVR rates were higher with the addition
of ribavirin and with longer treatment duration.
Only a few studies enrolled patients with genotype 2, 4, 5,
or 6, but high rates of SVR (>92%) were observed for all
regimens given for at least 12 weeks, and SVR rates were
particularly high (99%) among patients treated with
velpatasvir-sofosbuvir.
These oral DAA regimens offered high SVR rates with minimal
adverse events among patients who were poorly responsive to or
could not be treated with interferon, including those with HIV
coinfection, decompensated cirrhosis, severe chronic kidney
disease, and liver transplant.
Given the multitude of effective oral DAA regimens with
similar rates of SVR and adverse events, randomized controlled
trials are needed to sort out the best HCV treatments for
different patient populations, the researchers note.
�The safety and effectiveness of these drugs has not only
expanded the pool of patients that can be cured of hepatitis C,
but also makes it possible for providers who have not
traditionally treated hepatitis C (e.g., primary care providers)
to become hepatitis C treaters,� Dr. Falade-Nwulia said.
Dr. Jay H. Hoofnagle from the National Institute of Diabetes
and Digestive and Kidney Diseases in Bethesda, Maryland, who
wrote an editorial related to this report, told Reuters Health
by email, "It is important for the medical community to
understand that therapies for hepatitis C have matured and are
not going to get significantly better. Treatment is recommended
for all patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Many people
do not know that they are infected and those with risk factors
should be screened.�
�Currently approved therapeutic options for chronic HCV
infection are generally safe and highly effective with short
courses of treatment,� he said. �Viral eradication does not
completely eliminate the risk of future liver complication, and
appropriate follow-up of patients is still required.�
In his editorial, Dr. Hoofnagle notes that �public health
messages and television commercials have raised awareness of the
benefits of screening, but reaching the populations most likely
to harbor HCV will be a challenge. Compounding this problem are
the costs of these therapies. The current market prices for
available oral regimens in the United States range from $55,000
to more than $150,000. Even with negotiated price discounts,
these therapies will remain a considerable burden both to
private insurers and to our already fragile public budgets for
health care funding.�
Dr. Kurinchi Guruswamy from the Royal Free Hospital and
University College London, UK told Reuters Health by email, �The
major problem with this review is that the review does not look
at important patient measures, such as longevity or quality of
life; neither does it look at the proportion of people who
developed severe chronic liver disease (cirrhosis) or liver
failure (decompensated liver failure).�
SVR, he continued, �is an established prognostic marker, but
not a valid surrogate marker of clinical improvement, i.e.,
people who develop SVR have better outcomes related to longevity
of life, cirrhosis, and liver failure, but this develops in
particular groups of individuals who have better prognosis.
There has been no study showing that altering the SVR using
drugs results in improvement in longevity of life, cirrhosis,
and liver failure.�
�Physicians should ignore this finding and rely on
treatments that make a difference to longevity of life, quality
of life, cirrhosis, or liver failure,� Dr. Guruswamy concluded.
A 2013 paper coauthored by Dr. Guruswamy (http://bit.ly/2nxfFdU)
concluded that the �SVR threshold at which retreatment
increases life expectancy may be different for different drugs
depending upon the adverse event profile and treatment efficacy.
This has to be determined for each drug by RCTs and appropriate
modeling before SVR can be accepted as a surrogate marker.�
Dr. Raymond T. Chung from Massachusetts General Hospital in
Boston, who recently reviewed current HCV therapeutic regimens
and drug-drug interactions, told Reuters Health by email,
"All-oral regimens for hepatitis C virus are effective not only
in patients with uncomplicated disease, but also in populations
we once considered difficult to treat, including those with HIV
coinfection, those with impaired liver or kidney function, and
those who have undergone liver transplantation.�
These findings �should alert caregivers to the treatability
of all populations of patients infected with HCV,� he concluded.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2nFJV6Z
Ann Intern Med 2017.
|