Reuters Health Information: Newly developed photosensitizer safe in patients with solid malignancy
Newly developed photosensitizer safe in patients with solid malignancy
Last Updated: 2016-08-15
By Will Boggs MD
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Disulfonated tetraphenyl chlorin
(TPCS2a), a newly developed photosensitizer, appears to be safe
for photochemical internalization of bleomycin in patients with
solid malignancies, according to the results of a
first-in-humans trial.
But the treatment turned out to be unexpectedly painful,
although the pain dropped to "reasonable" levels after several
hours, researchers report in The Lancet Oncology, online July
27.
"There is a light-mediated drug delivery system that
enhances chemotherapy effects with minimal morbidity," Dr. Colin
Hopper from University College London Hospitals in the U.K. told
Reuters Health by email. "In particular, the treatment does not
seem to damage nerves, so it is function sparing (as opposed to
surgery) and it would seem to be repeatable (unlike
radiotherapy)."
Photochemical internalization has been shown in in vitro
experiments and in vivo models to enhance cellular uptake of
chemotherapeutic agents, especially those like bleomycin that do
not readily cross cellular membranes.
Dr. Hopper and colleagues examined the safety and
tolerability of TPCS2a-mediated photochemical internalization of
bleomycin in a phase 1 clinical trial of 22 patients with
advanced or recurrent cutaneous and subcutaneous malignancies.
On the basis of the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum
tolerated dose information, they selected an optimal dose of 0.5
mg/kg for further examination.
Administration of TPCS2a and the photochemical
internalization treatment did not cause any negative direct
effect on any of the monitored body organs, and there were no
adverse events within the first 96 hours after TPCS2a injection
before the administration of bleomycin and the initiation of the
photochemical internalization treatment.
The only unexpected adverse event related to photochemical
internalization was localized high pain levels (reported by nine
patients), which began a few minutes after initiating the
illumination procedure, started to decline one to two hours
later, and returned to "reasonable" (clinically expected) levels
at five to seven hours, the team reports.
TPCS2a remained detectable in blood 90 days after
administration of all evaluable doses.
Overall, at day 28, 11 of 19 patients (58%) achieved
complete responses, two patients (11%) achieved partial
responses, two had stable disease, and one patient had
progressive disease. Target lesions had completely resolved in
all four patients in the 0.25 mg/kg cohort and in four of seven
(44%) assessed patients in the 0.5 mg/kg cohort.
In patients with cutaneous malignancies, the malignant area
turned necrotic after illumination, whereas the surrounding
normal skin, although illuminated, remained intact. Results were
similar in a patient with a subcutaneous malignancy.
The depth of therapeutic change (i.e., depth of necrosis
achieved by photochemical internalization) appeared to be
greater in the 0.5 mg/kg cohort than in the 0.25 mg/kg cohort,
although the lower-dose cohort had a better overall effect
(tumor therapeutic depth and complete response outcome) and
fewer photosensitivity reactions, leading the researchers to
recommend the 0.25 mg/kg dose for future trials.
"Many solid tumors are resistant to chemotherapy because of
the way they metabolize agents," Dr. Hopper explained.
"Photodynamic therapy (PDT) allows the negation of these effects
and allows chemo drugs to hit their target. Hence, there should
be applications to a number of solid tumors - in the study we
looked at head and neck cancer, but also metastatic breast
cancer and sarcoma and all showed extensive tumor necrosis."
"The obvious limitation is with systemic metastatic disease
where photochemical internalization (PCI) can only really help
with localized problems," he said.
The researchers note that a multicenter phase 2 trial in
patients with head and neck cancer was terminated by the sponsor
before being completed, mainly because of strategic commercial
considerations. The company is proceeding with a phase 1-2 study
using this technology to enhance the effect of gemcitabine in
patients with bile duct cancer.
Dr. Steen Madsen from the University of Nevada in Las Vegas,
who wrote an accompanying editorial, told Reuters Health by
email, "Light-based therapies such as PCI have a role to play in
the management of patients with superficial lesions."
"PCI could be of potential benefit to patients with
superficial tumors, especially in the head and neck region," he
said. "PCI may also play a role as a salvage therapy in cases
where conventional treatments have been ineffective. Also,
unlike radiation and chemotherapy, retreatments are possible
with PCI."
"The excellent response of large tumors was surprising given
the relatively limited penetration depth of light in biological
tissues," Dr. Madsen said. "The authors postulate that this
might be due to immune responses and certainly warrants further
investigation in future studies."
Dr. Max Witjes from University Medical Center Groningen in
the Netherlands, who has studied the enhancement of bleomycin
cytotoxicity using PCI, told Reuters Health by email, "It is a
proof of principle that photochemical internalization actually
seems to work. I consider that an important step forward,
because it provides the basis for new drug delivery strategies."
"When a new PCI strategy has proven to be successful it
could grow to a worldwide industry with high turnovers," he
said. "In skin cancer, which of course is a huge worldwide
problem with millions of patients being diagnosed each year, PDT
has evolved to a serious industry."
PCI Biotech of Norway sponsored the trial and employed one
of the authors, Dr. Anders Hogset, as its chief scientific
officer. Dr. Hogset could not be reached for comments.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2aOiqSL and http://bit.ly/2bi3rQf
Lancet Oncol 2016.
|