Reuters Health Information: Liver donors may suffer long-term effects after donation
Liver donors may suffer long-term effects after donation
Last Updated: 2016-05-24
By Reyna Gobel
(Reuters Health) - People who donate a piece of their liver
may experience long-term physical, psychological and financial
adverse effects as a result, a new study suggests.
Researchers surveyed 517 adults who had donated a piece of
their liver three to 10 years earlier at nine transplant centers
in the U.S. and Canada.
"We were surprised donors continued to report some issues,"
study leader Dr. Mary Amanda Dew told Reuters Health by phone.
"We thought by the time they were so far out from the date they
donated part of their livers, they might not have difficulties."
Previous reports had tracked donors for only a year or two
after donation. Their longer-term health and quality of life
hasn't been well studied, she said.
Organ donors are highly screened and are generally healthy
psychologically and physically, she noted. In this study,
however, even many years after donation, many were reporting
problems that were clearly linked to their original surgery, she
said.
Seventy-eight donors, or 15 percent, reported
donation-related medical problems - most often hernias,
digestive issues, chronic diarrhea, and problems with scar
tissue, the researchers reported May 6 in Transplantation.
Also, 111 donors said they could not do some physical
activities as well as they could before donation. In particular,
the limitations involved exercises or activities requiring
abdominal strength, vigorous physical activity, and lifting
significant weight.
Finally, up to about a third of the donors reported health
worries due to donation, with concern about future health being
most frequently endorsed.
Still, more than 90 percent of donors said they would make
the same decision to donate again, and most had positive overall
feelings about donating.
The good news, according to Dew, is that donors' general
quality of life was as good as or better than for others in
their peer group. Even if the transplant recipient didn't
survive, donors felt positively about the donation, she said.
There's a psychological benefit to knowing you did
everything you could to save someone's life, Dew said.
"Another important issue concerns financial burdens donors
may have due to the donation," Dew said. "We are aware that this
financial burden exists. We need organs but it's unfair for
donors to have to take on this financial burden."
Based on their responses, the researchers were able to
divide participants into five distinct "clusters." The largest
consisted of 158 donors with a high degree of physical concerns
and some socioeconomic concerns, along with some psychological
benefit.
The next two largest clusters each contained 109 donors. In
one of these groups, donors reported high psychological benefit
but some degree of physical and socioeconomic concerns. In the
other, donors didn't get much psychological benefit from
donating but they also didn't have much in the way of physical
and socioeconomic concerns.
The fourth largest group, with 74 donors, had the best
outcomes, with the highest psychological benefit and mostly low
physical and socioeconomic concerns.
And finally, the smallest group consisted of 57 donors with
the lowest psychological benefit plus some physical and
socioeconomic concerns.
Dr. Rohit Loomba, a member of the American Liver
Foundation's National Medical Advisory Committee, told Reuters
Health by email that physical and financial effects "several
years down the road" after liver donation is a new finding.
"Finding five different groups helps us peek into how we can
move donors from one pool to another to minimize physical and
financial burden in future," added Loomba, who wasn't involved
in the study.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1sOzKvz
Transplantation 2016.
|