Reuters Health Information: Statin use may protect against NASH, fibrosis in NAFLD
Statin use may protect against NASH, fibrosis in NAFLD
Last Updated: 2016-04-11
By Anne Harding
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Non-alcoholic fatty liver
disease (NAFLD) patients who take statins are less likely to
have non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and significant
fibrosis, new findings have shown.
Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for NAFLD, and drugs that
diabetes patients take may affect liver histology because they
may interfere with insulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism, Dr.
Fabio Nascimbeni of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
in Modena, Italy, and colleagues noted in their report,
published online March 18 in BMJ Open Gastroenterology.
To investigate, the researchers looked at statin and
antidiabetic agent use and liver histology in 364 diabetic
individuals with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Fifty-seven percent had
NASH, and 48% had significant fibrosis. Eighty-four percent were
taking antidiabetic drugs and 45% were on statins.
Multivariate analysis found that statin use was
independently associated with a lower risk of both NASH (odds
ratio 0.57) and significant fibrosis (OR 0.47). Insulin use was
associated with a greater likelihood of NASH (OR 2.24), while
sulfonylurea use was associated with significant fibrosis (OR
2.04).
Some clinicians are reluctant to prescribe statins because
there have been reports linking statin use to increases in
aminotransferases, coauthor Dr. Vlad Ratziu of the Service
d'Hepatogastroenterologie in Paris, told Reuters Health in a
telephone interview. "They do not induce real hepatotoxicity;
however, increased liver function test keeps many physicians
from prescribing statins," he added.
But the new findings confirm other recent research
suggesting that statin use may actually be beneficial for
patients with NAFLD, Dr. Ratziu said.
"Only half of these high-risk patients were on statins, and
that number should have been much higher," he added. "There is a
problem of under-treating here, and there is no rationale for
this to continue."
The authors reported no funding or disclosures.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1N3Zc91
BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2016.
|