Reuters Health Information: Hepatic resection may be best for some multifocal liver tumors
Hepatic resection may be best for some multifocal liver tumors
Last Updated: 2015-08-28
By Will Boggs MD
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Patients with multifocal
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo hepatic resection
have better relapse-free survival than do those treated with
radiofrequency ablation (RFA), researchers from China report.
Hepatic resection is accepted as the first line of treatment
for patients with solitary HCC, but the best treatment for
patients with multifocal tumors (<=3 nodules <=3 cm each)
remains unclear.
Dr. Lunan Yan and colleagues from West China Hospital of
Sichuan University in Chengdu compared the short- and long-term
outcomes of hepatic resection and RFA in a study of 384
consecutive patients with multifocal HCC.
Two hundred twenty-four patients underwent hepatic resection
with a conventional open approach, and 160 patients had RFA
using percutaneous, laparoscopic, or open methods.
There were no postoperative deaths in either group, and the
rates of postoperative complications did not differ
significantly.
Similarly, there were no significant differences between the
resection and RFA groups in overall survival at one year (96%
vs. 90.0%, respectively), three years (71.7% vs. 72.7%) or five
years (36.3% vs. 37.8%), the researchers report in the Journal
of the American College of Surgeons, online August 19.
In contrast, relapse-free survival was significantly higher
in the resection group than in the RFA group at one year (87.5%
vs. 83.1%, respectively), three years (53.1% vs. 34.0%), and
five years (20.1% vs. 9.7%).
In a propensity-matched analysis of 140 pairs of patients,
overall survival was similar but relapse-free survival was
significantly higher in the resection group, compared with the
RFA group.
On multivariate analysis, the presence of three tumors,
portal hypertension, and tumors located in different hepatic
segments independently predicted poor postoperative survival.
"For patients with multifocal tumors meeting the BCLC stage
A, hepatic resection may offer significantly better relapse-free
survival (RFS) than RFA although no differences exist in the
overall survival between group hepatic resection and RFA, and
hepatic resection may be considered as the first-line treatment
option for those patients," the researchers conclude.
However, they add, "RFA may provide shorter length of
postoperative hospital stay, less cost, and less influence for
quality of life."
The team concludes, "hepatic resection may be more suitable
for early HCC patients with 2 tumors than RFA, but both hepatic
resection and RFA may be suitable for early HCC patients with 3
tumors. Similarly, hepatic resection may be more suitable for
early HCC patients with tumors locating in the same lobe
(Couinaud's segmentation) or segment (Takasaki's Segmentation)
than RFA, but both hepatic resection and RFA may be suitable for
early HCC patients with tumors locating in the different lobes
or segments."
Dr. Giovanni G. Di Costanzo from Cardarelli Hospital in
Naples, Italy, recently reviewed the best treatments for
intermediate-stage HCC. He told Reuters Health by email, "This
retrospective study shows in a large sample (this is a main
strength of the study) that resection is associated with longer
RFS in patients with two nodules located in the same liver lobe.
The same results were previously reported for single tumors
within BCLC A."
"In the other cases (3 nodules, location in different
lobes), main outcomes after resection and RFA were comparable,"
he said. "Therefore, in these last cases, due to the (lower)
cost, (shorter) hospital stay, and better quality of life, RFA
should be the treatment of choice."
"However, due to the retrospective design and potential
selection biases, this study is not enough to indicate definite
choices," Dr. Di Costanzo concluded. "A randomized controlled
trial should be needed (using the 3-year recurrence rate in
patients with 2 nodules, the sample size for each group will be
88 patients)."
Dr. Yan did not respond to a request for comments.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1hJtUWI
J Am Coll Surg 2015.
|