Reuters Health Information: Localized amyloidosis carries low risk of progression to systemic disease
Localized amyloidosis carries low risk of progression to systemic disease
Last Updated: 2015-05-22
By Larry Hand
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - The prognosis for patients with
localized amyloidosis appears to be good for long-term survival,
but patients still need to be assessed and monitored for the
more dangerous systemic amyloidosis, UK researchers report.
"Clinicians need to be aware that localized deposits of
amyloid are a rare differential diagnosis of a lump or tumor at
any site. This is particularly true in cases of very
slow-growing lumps," Dr. Ashutosh D. Wechalekar, of the National
Amyloidosis Centre in London told Reuters Health by email. "All
patients with amyloid deposits at any single site must be
assessed for systemic deposits, and cardiac, renal, and liver
deposits must be ruled out by simple tests."
"Without undertaking detailed assessment for systemic
amyloidosis, there is a risk that some patients may be missed
and develop irreversible organ failure," he added.
Dr. Wechalekar and colleagues analyzed data on 606 patients
with biopsy-proven localized amyloidosis who were diagnosed,
assessed and followed at their center between January 2, 1980,
and December 15, 2011. Their findings were published online May
7 in The Lancet Haematology.
Patients, 51% men, had a median age of 59.5 years and a
median symptom duration of seven months before diagnosis. The
most common localized amyloid deposit sites were bladder (16%),
laryngeal or tonsillar (15%), cutaneous (14%) and pulmonary
nodular (8%), and 121 (20%) had monoclonal immunoglobulin or
abnormal free light chains.
Nine patients (11%) had more than one localized cutaneous
amyloid deposits and two (6%) had more than one gastrointestinal
tract deposits.
Of the 606 patients, 67 (11%) also had autoimmune disorders,
including Sjogren's syndrome, hypothyroidism, rheumatoid
arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus.
After a median follow-up of 74.4 months, only seven (1%) had
progressed to systemic immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis,
and 264 (44%) had progression only at the local site. Of the
seven who progressed to systemic disease, five had started in
the lymph node, one started in the eyelid, and one started in
bone.
Of the 94 deaths during follow-up, clinicians attributed
three to progression to systemic disease.
The researchers estimated the five-year overall survival
rate for the patients to be 90.6% and the 10-year survival rate
to be 80.3%.
"We describe the largest reported cohort of patients with
localized immunoglobin light-chain amyloidosis, confirming that
the clinical features and prognosis in localized amyloidosis is
remarkably good, and very different from systemic light-chain
amyloidosis," the researchers write.
Asked what clinicians should tell their patients based on
these results, Dr. Wechalekar said, "They need to reassure their
patients with localized amyloidosis that this is very different
from the very serious disease of systemic amyloidosis. This
condition will not impact their survival. However, they need to
keep the condition under regular monitoring as the local lumps
of amyloid may increase slowly over many years and may need
removal if they are causing symptoms or problems."
He offered specific suggestions: "They should alert their
pathologists about this possibility and arrange for appropriate
staining of the biopsies. The pathologists must refer such
biopsies for specialist immunohistochemistry or mass
spectrometry for amyloid typing. All such biopsies must also be
reviewed by a hematopathologist to assess for presence of
malignant plasma cells or low-grade lymphoma, which may
occasionally be a part of this disease and need specific
treatment."
Dr. Christoph Rocken, of Christian-Albrechts-University in
Kiel, Germany, who wrote an accompanying editorial, told Reuters
Health by email, "The clinicians should inform their patients
that a thorough work-up is needed to classify amyloidosis as
either localized or systemic, as this has major implications on
treatment and outcome. Systemic amyloidosis is a serious disease
and may necessitate a systemic treatment, which could include
bone-marrow transplantation and chemotherapy."
Specifically, he added, clinicians should "confirm the
diagnosis histologically including proper classification of the
amyloid protein deposited . . . Clinicians (particularly general
practitioners) should seek expert advice. We have a couple of
Amyloidosis Centers in Europe with specialists to help
colleagues. They may also serve as referral centers."
He concluded, "Based on this study we should start to design
international prospective studies for the treatment of localized
amyloidosis. The data presented . . . provides an excellent
basis for that."
The authors reported no funding or disclosures.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1FowDNq and http://bit.ly/1ScLkIQ
Lancet Haematol 2015.
|