Better survival after partial hepatectomy for resectable multiple hepatocellular carcinoma?
Better survival after partial hepatectomy for resectable multiple hepatocellular carcinoma?
By Will Boggs MD
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - For patients who have resectable
multiple hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), partial hepatectomy may
offer better overall survival rates than transcatheter arterial
chemoembolization (TACE), researchers from China report.
According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging
system, patients with large multinodular tumors should undergo
TACE, but some retrospective studies have suggested that partial
hepatectomy provides better survival than TACE.
Dr. Hui Li from Second Military Medical University in
Shanghai and colleagues undertook a randomized comparative trial
to compare partial hepatectomy versus TACE in 180 patients with
resectable multiple HCC, 173 of which completed the study.
Five of 62 patients with recurrent HCC (a recurrence rate of
68.9%) in the partial hepatectomy group underwent reoperation,
50 patients received local ablation, and five received
sorafenib. Most of the patients in the TACE group underwent at
least three treatment sessions at an interval of one session of
TACE per 2-3 months.
Mortality after 30 and 90 days did not differ between the
two treatments, according to the March 17 Journal of Hepatology
online report.
Overall survival rates were consistently higher in the
partial hepatectomy group than in the TACE group: 76.1% versus
51.8% at 1 year; 63.5% versus 34.8% at 2 years; and 51.5% versus
18.1% at 3 years.
Median overall survival was longer after partial hepatectomy
(41 months) than after TACE (14 months), but there was
substantial overlap of the ranges of overall survival (1-50
months for partial hepatectomy versus 5-47 months for TACE).
On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of better
overall survival included partial hepatectomy versus TACE, two
tumors versus more than two tumors, and female gender versus
male gender.
"To achieve good results of partial hepatectomy," the
researchers conclude, "patients should be carefully selected to
minimize postoperative mortality and major morbidity."
While admitting the lower than usual survival rates after
TACE in this study, the authors suggest that patients in earlier
studies had less advanced HCC than the patients in their study.
Dr. Satoru Murata from Nippon Medical School in Tokyo,
Japan, compared these results with a previously published
Japanese study that found much better overall survival with
TACE. He told Reuters Health via email, "If confined to
Child-Pugh class A cases (a great deal of cases included in this
Chinese study were classified as class A), 3 years survival rate
reaches 56%, which is better than the survival rate in partial
hepatectomy group in this Chinese study."
"Also, 5 year survival rate in our facility, although not
published yet, is approximately 40%," Dr. Murata said. "So this
fact means that clinical results obtained by TACE for HCC is
technically, in other words, operator dependent. This article
does not clarify the person who performed TACE and their
experience. I strongly recommend to have experienced
interventional radiologists perform TACE."
"Finally, the regimen of anticancer agents for TACE used in
this study is uncommon," Dr. Murata said. "They mainly use large
doses of 5-FU, and extremely small doses of cisplatin. However,
mainstream of anticancer agents used in TACE worldwide is either
doxorubicin, or platinum agents including cisplatin. This
regimen is not common and authors should state why they chose
the regimen."
"Other than the randomized design of the trial, there are
few points that we can learn from this article, and I think it
is not appropriate to change treatment strategy, only based on
this study," Dr. Murata concluded.
Dr. Gagan K. Sood from Baylor College of Medicine and St.
Luke's Liver Center in Houston, Texas, had other objections to
the report. He told Reuters Health by email, "It is not fair to
compare this group with TACE; median tumor size was more than
>10 cm. TACE has best results with tumor size up to 5 cm."
"The study included a very small subset of highly select
patients (180 patients out of cohort of 2500) with large tumor
burden, who are not candidates for current curative treatment
options," Dr. Sood explained. "In the US, because of screening
guidelines, many patients are diagnosed at early stage and
surgical resection, TACE, or RFA (radiofrequency ablation) are
the options. Because of underlying cirrhosis and risk of
recurrence, liver transplantation remains an option. But as
transplantation is a limited resource, these options are worth
considering."
Dr. Li did not respond to a request for comments.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1iEvvoO
J Hepatol 2014.
|