| |
| The summaries are free for public
use. The Chronic Liver Disease
Foundation will continue to add and
archive summaries of articles deemed
relevant to CLDF by the Board of
Trustees and its Advisors. |
| |
|
|
| Abstract Details |
 |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
SAFETY OF RIFAXIMIN IN PATIENTS WITH HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY: RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED, PHASE 3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL |
|
|
|
|
| |
K. Mullen, S. Sigal, M. Sheikh, N. Bass, F. Poordad, K. Merchant, S. Huang, A. Shaw, E. Bortey, W. Forbes EASL 2009 poster
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, University of California San Francisco, Fresno, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Morrisville, NC, USA
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Background and aims: Rifaximin, a minimally absorbed gut-selective antibiotic, significantly reduced the risk of breakthrough hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in patients with HE by 58% (hazard ratio, 0.421; p< 0.0001) versus placebo in a large multinational trial. This analysis evaluated the safety of rifaximin in the study population.
Methods: Rifaximin (550 mg twice daily) was compared with placebo in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial for 6 months in patients with a history of HE. Continued therapy with lactulose was permitted. Patients with cirrhosis and documented episodic HE (Conn score ≥2) were enrolled while in remission (Conn score = 0 or 1). The primary endpoint was time to first breakthrough HE episode. Safety evaluations, including physical examination, laboratory values, and adverse events, were assessed at study visits.
Results: The safety population included 299 patients who received ≥1 dose of either rifaximin (n=140) or placebo (n=159). Mean exposure was greater for rifaximin (130 d) versus placebo (106 d), primarily due to breakthrough HE in the placebo group resulting in early discontinuation. Overall, 80% of patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), the majority being mild to moderate in intensity. The most common TEAEs (≥10%) that occurred more frequently for rifaximin than placebo were ascites (11% vs 9%), dizziness (13% vs 8%), fatigue (12% vs 11%), and peripheral edema (15% vs 8%) for rifaximin versus placebo, respectively. Severe TEAEs (26% vs 31%) and drug-related TEAEs (19% vs 21%) were similar in rifaximin versus placebo groups, respectively. A similar percentage of patients reported infection in the rifaximin and placebo groups (33% vs 31%, respectively), with the most common being urinary tract infections (6% vs 9%, respectively). The percentage of patients who experienced serious adverse events was similar in the rifaximin (36%) versus placebo group (40%). Additionally, 7% of patients died in each group. No significant differences were noted between groups in other safety assessments
Conclusions: These findings indicate that rifaximin 550 mg taken twice daily has a favorable safety profile, comparable to placebo in patients with HE treated for up to 6 months.
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|