| |
Terrault NA, Roland ME, Schiano T, Dove L, Wong MT, Poordad F, Ragni MV, Barin B, Simon D, Olthoff KM, Johnson L, Stosor V, Jayaweera D, Fung J, Sherman KE, Subramanian A, Michael Millis J, Slakey D, Berg CL, Carlson L, Ferrell L, Stablein DM, Odim J, Fox L, Stock PG; for the HIV-TR Investigators.. Liver Transpl. 2012 Feb 12. doi: 10.1002/lt.23411. [Epub ahead of print] |
|
| |
Source University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a controversial indication for liver transplantation (LT) in HIV-infected patients due to reportedly poor outcomes.
METHODS: This prospective U.S. multicenter cohort study compared patient and graft survival in 89 HCV-HIV coinfected versus 2 different controls groups: 235 HCV monoinfected LT controls and all U.S. transplant recipients ≥65 years.
RESULTS: The 3-year patient and graft survival rates (95% CI) were 60% (47-71%) and 53% (40-64%) in HCV-HIV versus 79% (72-84%) and 74% (66-79%) in HCV recipients (both p<0.001) and HIV infection was the only factor significantly associated with reduced patient and graft survival. Among HCV-HIV patients, older donor age (HR=1.3 per decade), combined kidney-LT (HR=3.8), HCV-positive donor (HR=2.5), and body mass index (BMI) less than 21 kg/m(2) (HR=3.2) were independent predictors of graft loss. In patients without these latter 3 factors, patient and graft survival were similar to those in U.S. LT recipients. The 3-year incidence of treated acute rejection was 1.6-fold higher in HCV-HIV versus HCV (log rank p=0.02) but cumulative incidence of severe HCV disease (29% versus 23% at 3 years, respectively) were not significantly different (p=0.21).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient and graft survival are lower in HCV-HIV compared to HCV alone LT patients. Importantly, rates of treated acute rejection but not HCV disease severity are significantly higher in HCV-HIV compared to HCV recipients. Our results indicate that HCV per se is not a contraindication to LT in HIV patients but recipient and donor selection as well as management of acute rejection strongly influence outcomes.
|
|
|