| |
| The summaries are free for public
use. The Chronic Liver Disease
Foundation will continue to add and
archive summaries of articles deemed
relevant to CLDF by the Board of
Trustees and its Advisors. |
| |
|
|
| Abstract Details |
 |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
Comparison of hepatitis C virus treatment between incarcerated and community patients |
|
|
|
|
| |
Rice JP, Burnett D, Tsotsis H, Lindstrom MJ, Cornett DD, Voermans P, Sawyer J, Striker R, Lucey MR. Hepatology. 2012 Apr 13. doi: 10.1002/hep.25770. [Epub ahead of print] |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Source
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison,WI.
Abstract
The prevalence of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among incarcerated individuals in the United States is estimated to be between 12-31%. HCV treatment during incarceration is an attractive option due to improved access to healthcare and directly observed therapy. We compared incarcerated and non-incarcerated HCV-infected patients evaluated for treatment at a single academic center between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2007. During this period, 521 non-incarcerated and 388 incarcerated patients were evaluated for HCV treatment. 319 (61.2%) non-incarcerated patients and 234 (60.3%) incarcerated patients underwent treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Incarcerated patients were more likely to be male, African-American race, and have a history of alcohol or intravenous drug use. Treated incarcerated patients were less likely to have genotype 1 virus and were less likely to have undergone previous treatment. There was a similar prevalence of co-infection with HIV in both groups. A sustained viral response (SVR) was achieved in 97 (42.9%) incarcerated patients compared to 115 (38.0%) non-incarcerated patients (p=0.304). Both groups had a similar proportion of patients that completed a full treatment course. Stepwise logistic regression was conducted and the final model included full treatment course, non-genotype 1 virus, younger age at treatment start, and negative HIV status. Incarceration status was not a significant predictor when added to this model (p = 0.075). Conclusion: In a cohort of HCV-infected patients managed in an academic medical center ambulatory clinic, incarcerated patients were as likely to be treated for HCV and as likely to achieve an SVR as non-incarcerated patients.
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|