| |
| The summaries are free for public
use. The Chronic Liver Disease
Foundation will continue to add and
archive summaries of articles deemed
relevant to CLDF by the Board of
Trustees and its Advisors. |
| |
|
|
| Abstract Details |
 |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
Resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review |
|
|
|
|
| |
Tang YH, Wen TF, Chen X. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Jul;59(117):1393-7. doi: 10.5754/hge10600. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Abstract
Background/Aims: To evaluate the influence of the width of resection margin on recurrence and survival for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methodology: Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized trials evaluating the influence of the width of resection margin for HCC were identified using a predefined search strategy. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled recurrence and survival rate. Results: One randomized controlled trial and four non-randomized trials were identified. The only randomized controlled trial reported that a margin aiming at 2cm could decrease the recurrence rate (p=0.037) and increase the 3-year survival (p=0.02) and 5-year survival rate (p<0.01) compared with a margin aiming at 1cm. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the group with resection margin <1cm and the group with resection margin ≥1cm in recurrence rate (p=0.08), 1-year survival (p=0.75), 3-year survival (p=0.53) and 5-year survival rate (p=0.15). Conclusions: A resection margin ≥1cm does not provide significant prognostic benefit compared with a resection margin <1cm. There is limited evidence to show that patients with a resection margin aiming at 2cm have better survival outcome than patients with a resection margin aiming at 1cm.
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|